Eclipse inherits the worst of both worlds: Solana-style pubkey-is-address on SVM and Ethereum ECDSA secp256k1 at settlement. Every account leaks from genesis, the sequencer is Nakamoto 1, and the chain cannot migrate unilaterally, it waits on two upstream roadmaps at once.
Summary
Eclipse is an SVM execution layer settling to Ethereum L1. PQC posture depends on both: Solana SVM Ed25519 (where pubkeys = addresses, maximum HNDL) and Ethereum ECDSA secp256k1 settlement. Centralized sequencer (Eclipse Labs) = Nakamoto 1. Fraud Proof Bonds planned 2026 but no PQC roadmap.
What the gates say
- Hybrid: FAIL. No hybrid plan on file.
- Evidence: PASS. Sources reconstructable by third party.
- Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.
Burn-vs-rescue policy on file
undeclared
Seven dimensions
Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.
1 Cryptographic Exposure 18 / 100
SVM execution layer + Ethereum L1 settlement; inherits both chains' crypto.
Ed25519 (SVM execution) · ECDSA secp256k1 (Ethereum settlement) · SHA-256 · Keccak-2562 HNDL Exposure 15 / 100
Solana-style addresses = pubkeys (100% exposure from genesis). Worst HNDL profile.
Young chain (~1 year mainnet); small cold supply.
All Ed25519 sigs Shor-breakable.
Standard TLS.
3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 12 / 100
Transparent.
Centralized sequencer (Eclipse Labs) = single mempool operator.
Ethereum↔Eclipse bridge.
No ZK application.
4 Migration Architecture 28 / 100
Dependent on Solana SVM + Ethereum settlement. Cannot unilaterally migrate crypto.
Solana-style accounts; no AA.
Young chain, some upgrade cadence.
No hybrid path; fraud proof bonds planned 2026.
5 Deployment Execution 2 / 100
Zero.
None.
Centralized sequencer, no validator set.
None.
No PQC claims.
6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 2 / 100
7 Governance & Coordination 28 / 100
Centralized sequencer = Nakamoto 1.
Eclipse Labs upgrades directly.
Named: Neel Somani (founder), Eclipse Labs. No PQC lead.
Centralized = fast coordination; decentralization roadmap slow.
The X + Y vs Z inequality
X (data shelf life): 3-10
Y (migration time): 5-10 (depends on both Ethereum and Solana PQC)
Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041
Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).
Four-scenario grid
| Scenario | Value preserved | Privacy preserved |
|---|---|---|
| quantum never | 100% | 100% |
| arrives suddenly pre migration | 5% | 3% |
| arrives slowly post migration | 45% | 20% |
| arrives slowly mid migration | 20% | 8% |
Peers in the rollup-L2 profile
Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to Eclipse by QRI.
Public artifacts used for this scorecard
Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.
SVM execution layer + Ethereum L1 settlement; inherits both chains' crypto.
Supply chain snapshot
A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.
Analyst notes on the scoring
Rollup-L2 scorecard profile applied (weights 12/8/8/15/22/25/10). Worst combination: inherits Solana's pubkey=address pattern AND Ethereum's classical settlement. Cannot migrate unilaterally.
Scorecard metadata
- Profile: rollup-L2
- Scored: 2026-04-18 by
layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-2 - v1 reference:
chainscreen-v1-archive - QRI raw: 9 · after caps: 9
- Confidence interval: ±7
- PQC washing ratio: 1x
- Burn-vs-rescue: undeclared
Caps triggered
- mosca_cap_60 (5a=0)
- sutor_cap_50 (5d=0)
- casado_cap (vendors 0)