MegaETH is selling 35,000 transactions a second. Post-quantum signatures are roughly a hundred times larger than ECDSA. You cannot advertise throughput AND avoid the signature question. At some point those two numbers meet, and nobody on the MegaETH side has shown the calculation.
Summary
MegaETH is a very young high-performance L2 (~35K TPS testnet), Vitalik-backed. Mainnet approximately 6 weeks old as of evaluation. Standard ECDSA + EigenDA stack, no PQC activity. High-throughput design creates potential headwind for PQ signature adoption (larger sigs consume bandwidth). Band 1 Unaware, very low confidence due to nascent state.
What the gates say
- Hybrid: FAIL. No hybrid plan on file.
- Evidence: COND. Reconstruction gap on at least one sub-score.
- Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.
Burn-vs-rescue policy on file
undeclared
Seven dimensions
Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.
1 Cryptographic Exposure 18 / 100
High-performance L2 (~35K TPS testnet) with Ethereum settlement.
ECDSA secp256k1 (inherited from Ethereum) · Keccak-256 · EigenDA BLS12-381 (DA attestations) · Optimistic rollup fault proofsNo PQC families deployed
No NIST PQC primitives deployed
2 HNDL Exposure 8 / 100
Testnet-primarily as of Apr 2025. Limited mainnet activity.
~6 weeks old. Minimal cold-key horizon.
ECDSA Shor-breakable.
Standard TLS. No PQC KEM.
3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 20 / 100
Pseudonymous EVM transparency.
Centralized high-performance sequencer + EigenDA. Concentrated infrastructure.
ETH<->MegaETH bridge visible.
Non-private by design.
4 Migration Architecture 22 / 100
Very early chain; upgrade framework not yet battle-tested.
Inherits ERC-4337/EIP-7702 from Ethereum.
Too young — weeks of operational history.
No hybrid PQC plan. High-throughput design may struggle with larger PQ sigs without optimization.
5 Deployment Execution 0 / 100
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
no public artifact found
No PQC announcements.
6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 4 / 100
7 Governance & Coordination 18 / 100
Centralized sequencer. No validator set.
Too young to demonstrate coordination under pressure.
MegaETH team (Li Yilong, Shuyao Kong). Vitalik Buterin publicly backed. No named PQC lead.
No precedent yet.
The X + Y vs Z inequality
X (data shelf life): 3-7 (very young chain)
Y (migration time): 10-15 (L2 + EigenDA dual-dep)
Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041
Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).
Four-scenario grid
| Scenario | Value preserved | Privacy preserved |
|---|---|---|
| quantum never | 100% | 100% |
| arrives suddenly pre migration | 10% | 10% |
| arrives slowly post migration | 75% | 65% |
| arrives slowly mid migration | 25% | 25% |
Peers in the rollup-L2 profile
Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to MegaETH by QRI.
Public artifacts used for this scorecard
Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.
High-performance L2 (~35K TPS testnet) with Ethereum settlement.
Supply chain snapshot
A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.
Analyst notes on the scoring
The high-throughput L2 architecture is a migration tension point: larger PQ signatures (ML-DSA ~3KB, SLH-DSA ~8KB) may conflict with 35K TPS bandwidth targets unless aggressive aggregation is deployed. No PQC roadmap found.
Scorecard metadata
- Profile: rollup-L2
- Scored: 2026-04-18 by
layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-3 - v1 reference:
chainscreen-v1-archive - QRI raw: 8 · after caps: 8
- Confidence interval: ±17
- PQC washing ratio: 1x
- Burn-vs-rescue: undeclared
Caps triggered
- Mosca (5a<20% → QRI max 60)
- Sutor (5d=0 → Migration Stage max 2)
- Preskill (most dims <3 artifacts × 0.5)
- Casado (4 vendor tiles pqc=0 → migration_stage max 3)
- Hybrid gate FAIL → QRI cap 60