Treasure is a gaming L2 whose quantum plan is Arbitrum's quantum plan. It pivoted from a standalone chain to an Orbit rollup in 2024 and now inherits the entire crypto stack, including the migration timeline. The sequencer is centralized, which makes coordination easy but adds nothing distinctive to the answer.
Summary
Treasure is an Arbitrum Orbit L2 focused on Web3 gaming (MAGIC token). Scored as rollup-L2 despite v1 categorization because it migrated to Orbit in 2024. Inherits Arbitrum crypto and migration stack; no independent PQ work. Small dormant surface; centralized sequencer.
What the gates say
- Hybrid: FAIL. No hybrid plan on file.
- Evidence: PASS. Sources reconstructable by third party.
- Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.
Burn-vs-rescue policy on file
none-announced; will inherit Arbitrum policy
Seven dimensions
Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.
1 Cryptographic Exposure 18 / 100
Arbitrum Orbit L2: inherits ZK and EVM primitives from Arbitrum stack.
ECDSA secp256k1 (EVM) · Keccak-256 · BN254 (ZK verification via Arbitrum Orbit)Classical only.
2 HNDL Exposure 18 / 100
EVM EOAs; pubkey exposed on first tx.
Young chain (launched 2024 on Arbitrum Orbit); small dormant surface.
Classical ECDSA.
Standard TLS.
3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 22 / 100
Transparent ledger; gaming tx graph.
Treasure-operated sequencer (Arbitrum Orbit centralized).
Arbitrum canonical bridge.
No shielded pools.
4 Migration Architecture 35 / 100
Inherits Arbitrum Orbit migration path; ERC-4337 AA supported.
Orbit chains support AA stack from Arbitrum; Treasure uses AA for gaming UX.
Orbit chain inherits Nitro upgrades; limited independent track record.
No PQ roadmap.
5 Deployment Execution 3 / 100
Zero PQC.
No PQ code.
Centralized sequencer; no PQ.
No PQ milestones.
No claims.
6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 5 / 100
7 Governance & Coordination 28 / 100
Centralized sequencer (Arbitrum Orbit model).
Inherits Nitro upgrade cadence; brief track record.
Named: Treasure team (MAGIC token).
Pivot from standalone chain to Orbit L2 2024; coordination precedent modest.
The X + Y vs Z inequality
X (data shelf life): 3-8
Y (migration time): 5-10 (dependent on Arbitrum L1 + Orbit)
Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041
Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).
Four-scenario grid
| Scenario | Value preserved | Privacy preserved |
|---|---|---|
| quantum never | 100% | 100% |
| arrives suddenly pre migration | 10% | 10% |
| arrives slowly post migration | 50% | 25% |
| arrives slowly mid migration | 25% | 13% |
Peers in the rollup-L2 profile
Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to Treasure by QRI.
Public artifacts used for this scorecard
Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.
Arbitrum Orbit L2: inherits ZK and EVM primitives from Arbitrum stack.
Supply chain snapshot
A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.
Analyst notes on the scoring
Stage 0. PQ posture fully dependent on Arbitrum; no independent signal. Classified as rollup-L2 per chain-specific note in task spec.
Scorecard metadata
- Profile: rollup-L2
- Scored: 2026-04-17 by
layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-5 - v1 reference:
chainscreen-v1-archive - QRI raw: 14 · after caps: 12
- Confidence interval: ±5
- PQC washing ratio: 0x
- Burn-vs-rescue: none-announced; will inherit Arbitrum policy
Caps triggered
- mosca_cap_60 (5a=0)
- sutor_cap_50 (zero milestones)